Inherited a Salesforce program in trouble? We re-scope to a defensible MVP, stabilize the build, and get you to a go-live that finally holds, then harden it.
Some of our best work starts with a program that has already slipped, failed a go-live, or run out of the leadership team's patience. The instinct is to push harder on the same plan. Usually the fix is the opposite: cut back to the smallest credible thing that can ship, and earn the date back.
We spend the first week on diagnosis, not surgery: which decisions are reversible, what the team actually uses, and where the real risk sits. Then we stabilize, re-architect the parts that are expensive to get wrong, and ship in increments until the platform is trusted again.
A fast, honest read on what is salvageable, what is technical debt, and where the program actually went wrong.
Cut the build back to the process the team runs today, and a date you can actually hold.
Fix the parts that are expensive to get wrong, starting with the data model and integration boundaries.
Incremental releases to a defensible go-live, then the hardening that keeps it healthy afterward.
A few sentences on where you are is enough to start.